Our Blogs

Plea bargaining is a common practice in Colorado criminal cases that involves a negotiation between the prosecutor and the defendant’s attorney to reach a compromise that results in a guilty plea in exchange for a reduced sentence or charge. Plea bargaining can have advantages and disadvantages for both the prosecution and the defense. This blog post will explore the pros and cons of plea bargaining in Colorado criminal cases.

Pros of Plea Bargaining:

1. Reduced Sentence: One of the main benefits of plea bargaining is that the defendant can receive a reduced sentence. By agreeing to plead guilty, the defendant can avoid a trial that may result in a harsher sentence. The prosecution may also offer a reduced sentence in exchange for the defendant’s cooperation or assistance in another case.
2. Cost-Effective: Trials can be costly for both the prosecution and the defense. By avoiding a trial, plea bargaining can save time and money for everyone involved. This is especially beneficial for the defendant, who may not have the financial resources to pay for a lengthy trial.
3. Certainty: Plea bargaining can provide certainty for both the prosecution and the defense. Trials can be unpredictable, and an unfavorable outcome is always risky. By agreeing to a plea bargain, both sides know the case’s outcome and can avoid the uncertainty and risk of a trial.
4. Avoid Publicity: Trials can be a public spectacle, with media attention and public scrutiny. By avoiding a trial, plea bargaining can help keep the case out of the public eye, which may benefit both the prosecution and the defense.

Cons of Plea Bargaining:

1. Coercion: One of the main criticisms of plea bargaining is that it can be coercive. The prosecution may use the threat of a harsh sentence to pressure the defendant into accepting a plea bargain, even if the defendant is innocent or has a strong defense case.
2. Loss of Rights: By agreeing to a plea bargain, the defendant gives up their right to a trial by jury, their right to appeal, and other constitutional rights. This loss of rights can be significant, especially if the defendant is innocent or has a strong defense case.
3. Injustice: In some cases, plea bargaining can result in an unjust outcome. For example, an innocent defendant may be coerced into accepting a plea bargain to avoid a harsh sentence, even though they did not commit the crime. This can result in an unjust outcome and undermine the justice system’s integrity.

Plea bargaining can have advantages and disadvantages for the prosecution and the defense in Colorado criminal cases. While it can provide a reduced sentence, cost savings, and certainty, it can also be coercive, limit discovery, resulting in a loss of rights, and lead to an unjust outcome. It is important for both the prosecution and the defense to carefully consider the pros and cons of plea bargaining before entering into a plea bargain agreement. Ultimately, the decision to accept a plea bargain should be based on the individual circumstances of the case and the interests of justice.

About the Author:

Andrew Bryant is a well-respected Colorado Springs criminal attorney who has been practicing in the area for years. A Colorado native, he returned to the home he loves after graduating from the University of Kentucky College of Law. Now, he uses the knowledge he gained as an El Paso County District Attorney to fight tirelessly for his clients’ rights. He is AV-Preeminent rated, has been recognized for his work by The National Trial Lawyers, and has been named to Best of the Springs lists by The Gazette for years.